Contact person:Andrew Ellis,
Director for Asia and the Pacific,
International IDEA
IDEA
was an initiative proposed by the Swedish Parliament in 1991. Four
years of discussions with representatives from more than 60 governments,
some 20 international organizations, and more than 150 individuals
followed. IDEA was then launched in February 1995 in Stockholm
as an intergovernmental organization with funding from 14 countries.
India was one of IDEA’s
original 14 founding member states, and it is still the only South
Asian member state. Japan is an observer.
The Institute was mandated with the responsibility
of sustaining and promoting democracy worldwide. IDEA was unique
in that it was to be the bridge between academic researchers and
democracy practitioners in the field. Rather than do electoral
observations, it was instructed to work with both new and long-established
democracies, helping to develop and strengthen the institutions
and culture of democracy. IDEA continues to operate at international,
regional, and national levels, acting in partnership with a range
of institutions.
The head office is located in Stockholm but IDEA also
keeps field offices on many places all over the World.
Research and other activities related to South Asia
IDEA has been active in facilitating in-depth democracy
assessment, dialogue and capacity-building programmes in many countries,
among them in Nepal. The organisation has also published a large
number of case studies on the use of quotas in Asia, Latin America,
Africa, Europe, and the Arab world to increase the representation
and participation of women in politics. It has further issued several
handbooks to provide practical tools and guidelines on electoral
systems, conflict management, quotas, and other issues related
to democracy, developed extensive databases on voter turnout, elections
administration and costs, political parties, and other topics for
use by democracy practitioners, researchers and the media.
IDEA also conducts
professional training courses throughout the world for election
administrators and officials from developing democracies, and has
created a comprehensive questionnaire for local citizens worldwide
to assess how well democracy functions in their own countries.
Consultation to democracy practitioners at the national
level are also offered, on such issues as referenda, constitutional
reform, reconciliation processes and other democracy-related topics.
Some of IDEA’s publications have been translated
into Asian languages including Nepali and Burmese (Electoral
Systems Design Handbook), Sinhala and Tamil (Policy Summaries of the handbooks
on Electoral Systems Design andReconciliation
After Violent Conflict: A Handbook), Burmese and Indonesian (Democracy
and Deep rooted Conflict: Options for Negotiators).
IDEA also conducts developed
the curriculum for professional training courses throughout the
world for election administrators and officials from developing
democracies, and has created a comprehensive questionnaire for
local citizens worldwide to assess how well democracy functions
in their own countries. Through its ACE network, consultation
by way of interactive network to democracy practitioners at the
national level are also offered, on many election related such
issues such as referenda, boundary delimitations, voter registration
and holding elections in the aftermath of conflict.constitutional
reform, reconciliation processes and other democracy-related topics.
South Asia is an important region in IDEA’s
activities. A South Asia programme team is included in the staff
at the headquarters in Stockholm. They consist of:
• Sakuntala
Kardirgamar-Rajasingham is a Senior Advisor to IDEA. Till 2008 she was Head of
Programme (South Asia). She has a
PhD in Law from University of Sydney, Australia, where she defended
a doctoral dissertation addressing the problems of democracy in
plural societies with special reference to Malaysia and Sri Lanka.
Before coming to IDEA in 1998 she was based in Washington DC where
she was a consultant to several NGO, UNDP and World Bank projects
on gender and development. Prior to this she was a Programme Officer
for the Law and Development Studies Division at the Marga
Institute for Research and Development in Sri Lanka. She has written on women
and development, women and political participation, conflict transformation
and on democracy.
• Leena
Rikkilä,
Programme Manager for Asia-Pacific, joined IDEA in 2003. She heads IDEA’s Nepal office based in Kathmandu.
Ms. Rikkilä
has a background in
the Dept. of Political Science and International Relations at
University of Tampere, Finland, and has been secretary-general
of Finland's Advisory Board for Relations with Developing Countries,
KESU, which monitors and assesses issues related to Finland's development
relations and global policy. Besides she is a former chairperson
(2001-2002) and current board member of Network Institute for Global
Democracy (NIGD). Among her roles at NIGD, she co-ordinated projects
promoting North-South dialogues on democracy and globalization
and was involved in the World Social Forum process. She has also
worked for the MOST (Management of Social Transformations) programme
at Unesco, Paris. Her most recent publication, From a Global Market
Place to Political Spaces (Helsinki May 2002), co-edited with Katarina
Sehm-Patomäki,
discusses Southern views on initiatives on global democracy.
She
has also written on matters related to gender and politicized religion
in violent conflicts, especially in South Asia. During 2004 Leena
Rikkilä co-ordinated IDEA’s project
on constitutional dialogues in Nepal, see below.
Since 1997 International IDEA has been assessing
the challenges to Nepal’s nascent democracy, and building
a multi-party consensus to support a democratic governance agenda.
A first assessment report on Nepal titled ”Consolidating
Democracy in Nepal” was published in 1997.
More recently (since 2004) International
IDEA carried out work contributed to a democracy assessment
in South Asia. In Nepal, IDEA’s State of Democracy
assessment methodology, which is a means for local people to scrutinize
their own democracy, was used as the framework. A new The Nepali
State of Democracy in South Asia Assessment Rreport is supposed
to be launched in late December 2006, and will be published by
Oxford University Press, together with similar regional assessments
carried out in Bangladesh, India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. More
information.
The Democracy Assessment in South Asia provided the
opportunity for in-depth dialogues on conflict transformation in
Nepal at a time where there was a political impasse between the
Monarch, the political parties and the Maoists. Currently IDEA
has a project to support the constitutional processes in Nepal
which includes: support for the creation of a credible and effective
Constituent Assembly, strengthening women’s political participation,
fostering greater inclusion of marginalised groups and communities
and engagement with all the constituent units of political units
supporting this transformation to democracy in Nepal.
IDEA is also involved in a project about ”Political
Parties in the Asia-Pacific”, consisting of data collection
and analysis of legal framework. This is being done since 2004,
within the framework of the newly established South Asia hub of
the so-called
Electoral Process and Information Collection
Project. Partners
of the South Asia Programme collected and analysed data on the
legal frameworks of Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka
and Maldives. The South Asian partner institution is Centre for
Study of Developing Societies in Delhi, India.
The South Asia Programme also organizes
a project titled ”External Environment
and Internal Party Management” on dialogue
meeting and it commissions case studies which focuses from the region
on the eternal regulatory framework and internal party management
affecting political parties. The project has a special emphasis
on addressing the election of the party leadership, funding,
and the inclusion of women in the party ranks and on party candidate
lists. In 2005, a workshop was convened with the authors of the case
studies, civil society monitoring groups, political parties and
party organizers in order to discuss ways of increasing participation
and accountability. Partners in this project are Centre for Policy
Alternatives, Sri Lanka; Centre for Alternatives, Bangladesh; Centre
for Civic Education, Pakistan; Centre for the Study of Developing
Societies/Loknitti, India; and Institute for Integrated Development
Studies, Nepal. A publication “Political
Parties in South Asia: The Challenge of Change” is forthcoming.
More
information.
Other IDEA initiatives on South Asia include projects
on:
• South Asian Approaches
to Reconciliation. A regional
network of organizations working on reconciliation and conflict
transformation issues has been established, its first meeting was
held in Stockholm on 17 March 2006.
• Reconciliation
Dialogues in Sri Lanka. To support the Cease fire agreement
of 2002 and the prospects of building peace in Sri Lanka, IDEA
convened in 2004 several dialogues on activities in the North,
East and the metropolis of Sri Lanka, dialogues were held in 2004
to introduce and debate concepts and processes of reconciliation.
Participants included the Sinhala and Tamil communities
and policymakers. A forum for inter-faith dialogue on reconciliation
was initiated in 2005.
• Constitutional
Dialogues in Nepal. IDEA convened several dialogues
to encourage civil society and political parties address the prospects
of linking constitutional reforms with peace building and conflict
transformation in Nepal. • Constitutional Dialogues in Sri
Lanka. A series of dialogues were held in Sri Lanka in 2006 on a
comprehensive constitutional design (including federalism, decentralization
and electoral reform). • Regional Training on Constitution
Building Processes. IDEA brought in practioners from civil society
and political parties from a range of countries undergoing constitutional
reform processes in the region to understand the requisites of developing
a participatory approach to constitution –making as this could
form the basis for improved participation, representation and conflict
management.
• Constitutional
Dialogues in Sri Lanka. A series of dialogues were held in
Sri Lanka in 2006 on a comprehensive constitutional design (including
federalism, decentralization and electoral reform).
• Dialogues
on the State of Democracy in South Asia. IDEA is currently
working onpartnered in the development of a regional assessment to
reflect citizens’ perceptions and experiences of democracy.
Scheduled for release in autumn December 2006, the report combines
quantitative data (surveys) along with qualitative data (from case
studies, dialogues and expert assessments) to establish a baseline
study of democracy. IDEA’s partners on this project are the
Centre for Studies on Developing Societies and Lokniti (India) and
international and national democracy researchers from South Asia.
IDEA's State of Democracy assessment methodology is being adapted
for the research, which will also seek to understand the culture
of democracy in South Asia. More
information about IDEA’s projects for Democracy Building
and Conflict Management in the South Asia.
IDEA Programme Document for Asia and the Pacific
In October 2009, IDEA released its new Programme Document for Asia and the Pacific. This document will enable the definition of the detailed
specific projects to be contained within the Asia and the Pacific element of
the institutional programme of operations and workplan that will be
presented to IDEA's governing Council for approval in
December 2009. Go for the document (as a pdf-file)
International IDEA workshop on electoral system desing with youth leaders of the Nepalese political parties, 4 July 2007 in Kathmandu.
Photo: Leena Rikkilä
In South Asia, IDEA continues to focus on Nepal. IDEA’s work in Nepal dates back to 2004, initially anchored in the field of citizen assessment of democracy. Following the 2006 democracy movement and the peace agreement, IDEA’s programme in Nepal supported local actors in the process of constitution building through the period of negotiation and preparation for elections to the Constituent Assembly (10 April 2008). IDEA is now supporting the CA members and committees through orientations and training, providing materials and background notes and supporting public participation to the constitution building process. IDEA is giving particular emphasis to the gender perspective of the constitution building process, facilitating platforms for women CA members and professional and civil society groups to address the constitutional issues. In the current context of fragile coalition government, challenges posed to implementation of the peace agreement and a worsening law and order situation in many parts of the country, IDEA believes that flexibility in responding to demands is important, and is facilitating dialogues on contentious constitutional issues such as the system of governance, affirmative action and the role and future of the security sector.
The major challenges of the constitution building process in Nepal remain related to consensus building by stakeholders, assuring social inclusion in the constitution and other policies, managing the diversity of the country, and coming up with implementation mechanisms and independent monitoring institutions. While the constitution building process was scheduled to be completed in mid-2010, this deadline may not be met: and the adoption of the new constitution will not in itself be sufficient for the consolidation of democracy, as comparative experience elsewhere shows. Support to Nepalese stakeholders in addressing these challenges will continue to be relevant through the period of drafting and adopting implementing legislation and developing the practical working of the new agreements and institutions.
IDEA’s current project, supported by Norway, runs until early 2010: it coordinates its work with UNDP and with other actors. The development of a continuation project has been welcomed by Nepalese stakeholders, to provide support throughout both the constitution building process itself and the subsequent period of drafting and adopting implementing legislation and developing the practical working of the new agreements and institutions. A three year project proposal is in the course of detailed design and will be submitted to Norway later in 2009.
In addition, Finland is supporting a project to develop inclusion, supporting comparative knowledge resources and dialogues around an integrated approach to accountability that addresses constitutional rights, institutions of judicial review, and the political legitimacy of the institutional framework.
The programme may in future consider addressing the development of political parties in Nepal.
Objectives of the programme
Constitution Building
• To build capacity of key political actors in Nepal;
• To initiate dialogue among key political actors for building consensus on constitutional issues and in support of the peace process; and
• To support participatory and inclusive constitution making processes.
The project will reach out to marginalised groups by supporting initiatives to ensure a consultative constitution building process.
Expected results of the programme
• Key stakeholders agree on realistic expectations and agendas for the Constituent Assembly, and those expectations are communicated to the public;
• Operational consensus building mechanisms amongst the political stakeholders over issues threatening the process are used;
• Mechanisms of participation and consultations with citizens on constitution making are agreed and implemented;
• Increased national capacity through access of key political actors, government and wider public to tools and information on comparative constitutional processes;
• Informed political decisions are made in Constituent Assembly over key political choices (including Head of State/government/legislature relationships, electoral system, federalism, devolution of power, gender equality, and monitoring and oversight mechanisms);
• Security institutions, especially policing, are discussed at various platforms in the context of democratic governance and federal structure; and
• Increased professionalism by the electoral management body when carrying out future elections.
Description of expected outcomes
Support to the Constitution Building Process
Phase 2:
• In the process of detailed definition based on discussions with local stakeholders and partners and flowing from the expected results above.
Supporting Constitution Building in Nepal: Implementation of Rights, Oversight and Accountability Mechanisms of the New Constitution
• Increased national capacity to advance debates on the process of implementing constitutional reform processes and the possible definition and establishment of oversight and monitoring institutions;
• Increased understanding by CA members on implications of different definitions of the roles and relationships of the Head of State, the government and the legislature; and
• Improved understanding among the CA members (with a particular focus on the CA women's caucus) and other stakeholders (including political party policy makers) on necessary conditions for effective implementation of women’s rights in terms of institutional arrangements.
Capacity building for electoral administrators
(to be carried out in partnership with the Election Commission of Nepal in collaboration with UNDP and IFES)
• Improved comparative knowledge on electoral systems, electoral management design, and electoral dispute resolution among the Electoral Commission of Nepal and other political stakeholders through knowledge resource dissemination, technical advice and capacity development initiatives;
• Development and implementation of a comprehensive, effective and participatory post-election review process based on the electoral cycle; and
• Monitoring of potential electoral conflicts and violence using IDEA’s Electoral Violence Early Warning and Response Management Tool.
SASNET - Swedish South Asian
Studies Network/Lund University
Address: Scheelevägen 15 D, SE-223 70 Lund, Sweden
Phone: +46 46 222 73 40
Webmaster: Lars Eklund
Last updated
2009-10-08